On 4/2/2010 0:49, Marek Goldmann wrote: > On 2010-04-02, at 01:26, graziano obertelli wrote: >> this is so cool that euca2ools are making into fedora. We just added them >> to our Q&A so that whenver we test Eucalyptus on fedora (we are working >> into making nightlies of rpm for fedora) we use your package. So far they >> passed all the tests! Let me know if we can help in any other way. > > If they're good, please vote on tested releases: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/euca2ools > > Create an account if you don't have one here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/new This. Packages in updates-testing need, well, testing before they can be safely pushed to stable. But they aren't considered "tested" until enough people try them out and give them comments and +1/-1 votes in the updates system. You could even try it right now: install euca2ools-1.2-2 from updates-testing, see if it works (and hopefully fixes some bugs), then add feedback to the update. On 2010-04-02, at 01:26, graziano obertelli wrote: > So far they passed all the tests! Let me know if we can help in any > other way. It looks like you could use some more test coverage, then. Specifically, I don't think you're covering block device mapping at all, given https://launchpad.net/bugs/544706. Perhaps you folks could take a look at the bug I'm stuck on (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575258) and if you have any ideas comment on the bug report or just let me know. If you want I could file it in Eucalyptus's tracker as well; would that help?
