On Feb 25, 2010, at 13:32, Jeremy Katz wrote: > One thing to keep in mind is that the images we're talking about end > up having some things that are pretty specific to the way EC2 works as > a part of them. The minimal kickstart could be helpful to point them > to as a starting point, but sadly, I'm not sure that it will be much > more as depending on how they market their VPS, they may have their > own reasons to, eg, go ahead and have apache or php or some other > thing installed as part of their "base" image. Is our plan to only support EC2/Eucalyptus, then?
