On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 11:11:04AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 03:29:21PM -0800, graziano obertelli wrote: > > question, which may be answereed but some directed google search. The > > first one of which is this one: so far we used xen as the hypervisor of > > choice on CentOS (and RHEL), but I know that now both are included in > > Fedora. Which one is the preferred one? Which one should be the Eucalyputs > > default? > > I've only used it with xen at this point; is there more to this change than > changing HYPERVISOR="xen" to HYPERVISOR="kvm" in the configuration file? That should be it: we will do the testing with kvm. At time we have problem with kvm versions and EBS, or kvm and libvirt or policykit: we just need to test and be sure that the user eucalyptus can drive libivirt and can run images off the instance directory. > Also, did you see my suggestion the other day on the subpackage names? Yes, absolutely. I'm not sure we can change the packages name this late in the cycle, but we are investigating it. cheers graziano > > -- > Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> > Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services > Computing & Information Technology > Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud -- Graziano Obertelli Eucalyptus Systems, Inc. 130 Castilian St. Goleta, CA 93117 Office: 805-845-8000 www.eucalyptus.com
