On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 08:47:10AM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Thanks for the update. Comments inline. > > Firstly I'd like to apologise for my lack of public participation in > the SIG, the last year or two has proven quite problematic for me > personally, I've had a lot of "higher priorities" which has reduced my > available hacking time, and that seems to quickly get gobbled up with > things like RPi regressions and release blocker bugs. Throw in a whole > bunch of mental health issues and something had to give. yeah, I hear ya. This last few years have been difficult here too. ;( > That being said, in the last few weeks I have been actually back to > some hacking projects... more on that below. > ...snip... > So I have been booting the original Pinephone on Fedora 39, display > works so I'd be interested in the issues you're seeing there. I'm > booting the original PP because of the Wireless, I've been looking at > some of the realtek modules for another project but hoping the side > effect is actually the rtl8723 series devices should be upstream > soon(ish). This should also resolve the issue on the original PineTab > although I don't remember who has that as I don't (the people that do > please reach out if you want to help testing). I've not looked too much at the pp recently... it's just so... slow. I suppose if wifi and display works it could be of some use now. > The PPP is also on my list to look at again soon, initially it'll be > around U-Boot due to the F-39 blocker issues as I'm working to resolve > that upstream for once so I'll be testing that on my PPP, I thought we > had the wireless and screen there, I do need to circle back more to > this one though TBH. We did have screen at one point. wifi we had also at one point if you copied a blob over that wasn't in linux-firmware. But I don't think either are currently working. :( > > Until the advent of some performant mobile device to target or more > > contributors who wish to drive things forward, I think we should just > > mark the Mobility sig inactive at this point, including: > > I think marking the SIG as inactive probably makes sense. > > > Retire the Phosh spin in f40 > > What's currently produced here? We have a Phosh aarch64 raw image. But... without much if any hardware it actually boots on. > > Hopefully find new maintainers for the phosh stack if there’s folks that want to keep them alive. > > How much work is this? How many packages? tor posted about them here: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/needing-to-handoff-mobile-sig-packages/89303 This is the phosh stack and a few other things. > > Mark the sig inactive on wiki and matrix. > > Just as I actually get the energy to setup matrix :-P although I am > yet to find the SIG there Should be #mobility:fedoraproject.org room > > respins will move to against a stable fedora release once a week or so, instead of against rawhide and more often. > > What's in the respins? Is that basically Fedora and custom kernel? Yep. Fedora userspace/packages, but heavily patched kernel with all the stuff to make pp/ppp work. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
