Thanks Peter, On Tue, November 30, 2021 8:32 am, Peter Robinson wrote: >> Looking at the --supported list in arm-image-installer I see a bunch of >> the NanoPi variations, except for the one I have (from work), the >> NanoPi-R1. >> >> I was able to get Armbian running on it without any issue, and it's >> running quite happily. However, I would certainly much prefer to run >> Fedora. >> >> To that end, what would it take to get Fedora onto the device? > > There's no upstream support in U-Boot for the device, in the upstream > Linux kernel there is a device tree, so you may be able to use a 3rd > party U-Boot but YMMV. Well, I do have a "working" u-boot for the platform... But yeah, it would certainly be "better" to have it upstream. *sigh* I've been using Wandboards, which I've liked, but I discovered that what I was using just wasn't powerful enough to do what I wanted to do.. So I was looking for replacements for my wandboards. I have a handful of these R1 devices from work, so I've been able to play with them and verify that, yes, it can do what I want and perform much better than the wandboard quad did. Let me turn this around; what board (with case) would *YOU* recommend for some small, low-power arm-based server platforms? -derek -- Derek Atkins 617-623-3745 derek@xxxxxxxxx www.ihtfp.com Computer and Internet Security Consultant _______________________________________________ arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure