On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 2:21 PM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 2:11 PM Jonathan Rioux <jonathanrioux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > @PeterRobinson > > By querying pacman, I get that package uboot-pinebookpro-bsp 1.5-8 is installed on my new machine. > > There seems to be a 2021.4-1 package available also. > > > > Ok, for nvme and deep sleep; it seems it needs bsp patches for uboot to work. https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=10264 > > That's based on a post from July 2020 where the upstream PBP was > basic, a lot has changed since then and most of what you reference is > irrelevant In fact looking at the patch set we have a much newer more advanced U-Boot, and most of the patches they reference were in fact my patches. > > But on the same site, it say we can put the uboot on the eMMC, should be less risks to debug than flashing on the SPI. > > What do you base the risk on? There's no risk of permanently bricking > the PBP with SPI flash, there's a recovery button that allows you to > recover over USB-C, as the person that submitted the upstream support > for the PBP believe me I've tried that functionality a lot! > > > @MatthewMiller > > Well there's work to get graphical uboot here : https://github.com/samueldr/wip-pinebook-pro/pull/13 > > We already have most of the patches to enable display graphics The only thing we don't already have is a logo, and there's reasons why I've not done that yet. I'm working on proper BGRT shiny boot. _______________________________________________ arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
