I have an old pine64 and a rpi 3 model b+, I am happy to help in testing as well. If there is a list of supported devices, then people can add their names who have them and want to help test Fedora on them, that would be very helpful. During the time of a release, QA can just ask them if they have tested the release candidate image on them and get feedback from them directly rather than putting more work on arm folks to test the image on every supported platform. On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 1:07 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:28:49AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > In the meeting right after the F33 release, we talked about identifying a > > handful of key devices and making sure anyone with a serious interest in > > testing or enablement work has what they need. I've talked with Marie, and > > while we're not overflowing with cash, Fedora does have unspent budget which > > would normally have gone to travel sponsorships and this seems to be a > > reasonable thing to use some of it on. IoT is a Fedora Edition, after all, > > and worth investing in. > > > > At that meeting, we talked about y'all coming up with a list of specific > > hardware we can order for people. Because reimbursements are a mess right > > now for unrelated reasons, it's easiest when it's something Marie can > > actually go to a web store, click some buttons, and have shipped direct. Can > > y'all (IoT WG and ARM SIG) come up with a formal list with prices and URLs? > > (Also, if other things like microsd cards need to be included?) > > > > Of course, once we have a list of hardware, I'd also like to send it to > > people. I know there's some worry about people volunteering, getting stuff, > > and not actually doing anything. We want to make sure the devices are going > > to people who will actually be able to make use of them. But I also don't > > want that to be a blocker, so, if you're new but serious I am willing to > > consider including you too. (Perhaps with the promise that if your best > > intentions don't work out, you find someone else to pass the hardware on > > to.) > > > > Rather than people emailing me at random, which is easy for me to drop, can > > the WG and/or SIG come up with a list of people? I'm thinking something like > > a dozen people and 1-3 devices each depending on commitment level. > > I have some very old pine64 boards and a beagleboneblack here... > I'd be happy to test some more up to date hardware. > > kevin > _______________________________________________ > arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
