On 2018-12-09 18:07, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/9/18 11:41 AM, mark co-dyre wrote:
Interesting ... I'd like to check that patch out.
I believe the HC2 is really just a XU4 thats been turned into a NAS correct?
If so the XU4 is a 32 bit 8 core SOC device (4-2GHz cores and 4-1.2GHz cores)
where the C2 is a 64 bit 4 core (1.5ghz) device. I think Samsung put these 8
core devices in the galaxy s6 phones.
I have both devices actually. But my focus has been on the 64 bit devices
because I found the fan on the XU4 undesirable and believe the 64 bit arm
devices will take over the 32 bit ones eventually. Been the XU4 board is
quiet awesome as well.
As for performance, the benchmarks that hardkernel has shown the XU4 out
performs the the C2. The specs say that as well. Faster processors, more
cores, faster vpu, usb 3.0 vs 2.0.
I plan on getting all devices working although I had wanted to start on these
devices first.
Which thread talks about that patch?
I think it is subject:
how to make a working f28 sd card for odroid-hc2
Torbjorn Jansson <torbjorn.jansson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Has been working on this.
i assume you refer to this uboot patch:
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=patch;h=9cd97c5b049a9a282dda0b1782cbb38d8cedb417
all this is doing is to add detection for hc2 and then load the correct dtb
file and that's all.
without this patch you need to create a symlink or copy to make it load the
correct dtb file (the hc1 one since hc1 & 2 is basically the same thing)
an mark, please quote past mails in the thread when you reply so it is clear
what you are replying to.
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
