Re: [Feedback on aarch64 image]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I wanted to try aarch64 image, but I  had a small issue.
>
> When I used arm-installer, it  triggered an error and did not complete, I
> discovered that vg name is fedora, but this is also the same name for my
> laptop...
>
> Perhaps adding aarch64 on the name could reduce the risk of conflicts
> "fedora_aarch64", it could also be a release number such as F28 "fedora_F28"
> or both "fedora_F28_aarch64" :)

We use the same setup across all architectures, also by putting a
version in there it's obsolete as soon as someone upgrades to a newer
versions as opposed to clean install every release.

> By the way, probably a stupid question, what are the differences between
> armhfp and aarch64  builds ?

armhfp is 32 bit ARMv7 with hard floating point, aarch64 is 64 bit.
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux