Re: Fedora 28 will not have stack clash protection on armhfp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/04/2018 04:11 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 7:46 PM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Due to bug 1522678, we will not be able to enable -fstack-clash-protection
on armhfp.

Is there an upstream bug report/thread for this? It would be useful to
at least make the appropriate ARM maintainers aware of the problem so
if they're interested enough or see value in it they can deal with it
and then it can be enabled later.

Nobody has written a patch, so 32-bit ARM uses the generic bits, which are suboptimal (in terms of ABI compliance and protection level) and, it appears, not really usable.

Even the final aarch64 bits are still pending review by the ARM maintainers.

Can you please also make sure any arm specific bugs are linked against
ARMTracker, I can't escalate unknown issues to contacts I have with in
relevant organisations if I don't know they exist, and it's impossible
to track all bugs.

Okay, I will do that in the future.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux