On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 04:14:04PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > >> <konrad(a)kernel.org> wrote: > >> > >> I don't see Hikey 960 anywhere there as supported. It's not currently > >> supported. We'll be supporting Hikey620 (original or what ever you > >> wish to call it) and Dragoonboard 410c in Fedora 27. > >> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architecture/ARM/HiKey > > There's no mention of the 960 on that page Correct. I was more of asking this as I am curious how to translate the ISO which has an EFI grub and install.img to this weird fastboot loading mechanism - where you can tweak the partition sizes, etc, via the fastboot mechanism. > > > is pretty funny on explaining how to do it: "Uses U-Boot to boot EXTLinux to boot GRUB to boot LILO... or something like that." > > And version 99, it was a test against the docs template > > > And https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Architecture/ARM/Dragonboard_410 > > > > does not even exist. > > Sure, we're still working on the vendor/device templates. Ahhh! > > >> The 960 support should hopefully come with Fedora 28 but until I get > >> hardware (which might be RSN) I have no idea. Upstream kernels look to > >> be supportable with 4.14 so bootloader depending it should be OK for > >> F-28 > > > > Are there any bugs created for it? Or for the HiKey or Dragoboard 410c? How do you guys track them? > > To date mostly in my head because I end up doing most of the work..... Oh my. If you want somebody to help with the testing, I can try doing the HiKey 620 tests on the HiKey 960 as well. _______________________________________________ arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
