Re: ARM and AArch64 GCC 7.1 ABI change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



forwarding to the ARM list for better visibility by the ARM team


		Dan

On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:55:47 -0500
Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> El mar, 25-04-2017 a las 17:52 +0200, Jakub Jelinek escribió:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > A severe ABI bug on AArch64 and especially on ARM 32-bit has been
> > recently discovered and GCC 7.1 is going to have that ABI change in.
> > For details see http://gcc.gnu.org/PR77728
> > gcc-7.1.1-0.16.fc{26,27} which I'll build tomorrow will contain the
> > ABI changes as well as a -Wpsabi diagnostics (note:) on code that is
> > changing the ABI.
> > The ABI change should affect primarily just C++ code passing PODs
> > by value where all the non-static data members and base classes are
> > at most
> > word aligned, but there are some static data members with doubleword
> > or bigger alignment or there are typedefs or other nested types in
> > the class/struct which are doubleword or bigger aligned, and are
> > passed
> > in certain positions in the argument list (passing them in even
> > registers
> > is fine, passing them in odd ones changes ABI, on the stack at odd
> > positions
> > might change the ABI too).  For the typedefs, the broken ABI of GCC
> > 5.2 to 7.0.1
> > has been actually not even self-consitent in some templates, earlier
> > instantiation vs. lack thereof could affect the ABI.  GCC 5.1 and
> > earlier
> > for structs used to match earlier AAPCS version and had different
> > rules and
> > issues.
> > 
> > Could somebody from rel-eng perform a test mass rebuild on armv7hl
> > and aarch64 of F26 to determine which packages are affected by the
> > ABI changes so that we could rebuild only those that actually need
> > changing? 
> 
> We do not currently have resources or tooling to do test rebuilds.  Do
> you have any idea what would be needed in order to do so?
> 
> > If grepping for note: is not good enough for the test mass rebuild,
> > I could
> > hack up a test compiler that does something different when it
> > encounters
> > this (say abort if it encounters this and some special env var is
> > set,
> > or writes something into some /tmp/ file and let some brp script
> > collect
> > info from there, etc.).
> 
> Dennis
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux