Re: 48-bit support in F26?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/19/2016 12:29 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
Jeremy,

On 21.09.16 14:57:45, Jon Masters wrote:
Going forward, I would /also/ like to be 52-bit VA tolerant.

are current fixes for 48 bits sufficient to later extend it to 52
bits? It would be good if userland can already support 52 bits to
avoid fixing it again.

Well, just to muddy the waters a bit. Its possible there will be further problems with 52-bit VA's. Its hard to predict what other latent applications are using tagged pointers in bits that aren't affected by the 48bit VA. Plus, the js 1.85 changes just bump the tags a little higher. So anything still using 1.85 with 52-bit VA's will have problems. That is part of the reason why i'm trying to move everything that is still on js185 to mozjs24/38.


_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux