Re: Kraxel's Kernel and VC4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey Paul,

Yes the image is AARCH64 ! Thanks. 

Cheers,

ASD. 

Aly S Dharshi  B.Sc. Computer Science, RHCE 
Technology Strategist 
m. 780 722 3461  t. 780 428 5226 
e. aly@xxxxxxxxxx w. alydharshi.com
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. 
Think before you print. 

On Oct 21, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Paul Whalen <pwhalen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



----- Original Message -----




I have tried the Fedora 25 build and X comes up on the PI3 fine. BUT I have
found it to be rather heavy. This is my opinion but Midori works but isn't
the greatest. Firefox installs but seg faults on start up.

I've been running firefox just fine on all the builds since we announced
them. Is this the "Kraxel" image/kernel? You'll need to provide more useful
information than "it seg faults".

If the image is aarch64 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354671




Overall it seems that the F25 build needs a lot of tuning to run on the Pi
smoothly. But this is to be expected. Performance is sluggish and not like
on an X86.

It's a $35 device... you can't expect x86 laptop performance. I would suggest
you have a good quality micro SD card, it makes a lot of difference (Samsung
EVO or SanDisk Ultra are the two I use).



Kraxel's kernel is 64 bit and seems to run smoother on the V8. Only thing
lacking is to get X going on the actual console of the machine as opposed to
going they XRDP. Also he is running a 4.7.x vintage of kernel. Again nothing
wrong with that at all at the moment.

64 bit user space as well? A 64 bit kernel with a 32 bit user space will have
no difference. You can run Kraxel's kernel if you want but there's not much
we can do to help you with that.



I am also interested in the Gigabyte server box with has Cavium chips. But
that one has nothing to do with this thread and is targeted imho to RHEL7.3.
Thanks.

We support those already in Fedora 25 too.



Cheers,

ASD.


       
   

   
           
   
   Aly S Dharshi        B.Sc. Computer Science, RHCE

   
   Technology Strategist

   
   m. 780 722 3461        t. 780 428 5226

   
   e. aly@xxxxxxxxxx        w. alydharshi.com

   

   
                       
   

   If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
   This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
   individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
   disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
   immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
   delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient
   you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any
   action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
   prohibited.
   

   Think before you print.
   

   

On Oct 20, 2016, at 1:47 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz < mjuszkiewicz@xxxxxxxxxx >
wrote:




W dniu 20.10.2016 o 19:38, Aly Dharshi pisze:



I have successfully installed Fedora 24 with onto a RPI3 with Kraxel's


kit.

[..]



Would anybody have any thoughts on solving this issue. I know it may not


be completely a Fedora problem especially since its not a Fedora team


built kernel. But would still appreciate the help. Thanks/

Test Fedora 25 image. If it works, tell us. If it does not tell us too.



If you have received this email in error please notify the system


manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended


only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you


should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify


the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by


mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the


intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying,


distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this


information is strictly prohibited.

And I do not know how many your company rules I just broke by replying
to your email without removing it first...
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux