Great - that was my preference just didn't want to overkill it. But this sounds like good test run of doing the process the right way... -- Computer Architect | Sent from my 64-bit #ARM Powered phone > On Sep 14, 2016, at 17:13, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Jeremy, all, >> >> I was just catching up with some folks and we discussed the status of >> 48-bit VA support. It seems to me that it would make most sense to have >> an official coordination effort between those vendors/community members >> who are interested, to ensure that they help with the necessary package >> updates ahead of the kernel, and work with a test kernel to identify any >> additional packages or issues that need resolving. I believe it would >> make most sense to have a Fedora feature page (or something less grand, >> but similar in concept) tracking this for F26, with the deps. > > I would very much advocate for the full Feature page. It will get the > change the appropriate attention technically, and it will raise > awareness of Aarch64 within Fedora from a general sense. > > josh _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
