On 09/14/2016 01:00 PM, Ziqian SUN(zsun) wrote: > Sorry for reply on ancient mail. > I see that neither HiKey nor DragonBoard is marked in the wiki[1]. So I want to know what's the support status of Hikey Board? > > And I see usually we ship ISO for aarch64, while Hikey and Dragon Board usually needs a img. So if supported, any hints on how I can install it on my Hikey (or even, how can I convert the ISO to a img file)? > > Thanks. > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/AArch64/F24/Installation Hi, The dragonboard uses a different bootloader (little kernel) than was is expected for Fedora aarch64 installation. There is a Fedora 23 remix that runs off of a sd card for the dragonboard 410c: https://dmarlin.fedorapeople.org/fedora-arm/aarch64/README.Linaro-F23-remix-lxde -Will > > On 09/25/2015 09:51 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Clive Messer <clive.m.messer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Peter, >>> >>> Is F23 aarch64 supporting either HiKey or Dragonboard? >> >> HiKey should boot with 4.2 (what's in F-23) with MMC, usb looks >> terrible which isn't particularly useful, in theory wireless is >> upstream but I've not had a chance to get that far as I'm awaiting a >> decent UART [1] for easy debug of the board, at the moment I've not >> enabled dragonboard (QCOM) but it's on my list for next week, it's >> confirmed that HDMI has issues but everything else should work. The >> QCom stuff has weird bootloaders (not uboot or uEFI) so YMMV. >> >> [1] http://www.seeedstudio.com/depot/96Boards-UART-p-2525.html?ref=newInBazaar >> _______________________________________________ >> arm mailing list >> arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm >> > _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
