Hi,
On 04-05-16 18:36, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Wednesday, May 4, 2016 4:17:17 PM CDT Andreas Reschke wrote:
Am 03.05.2016 um 23:30 schrieb Dennis Gilmore:
On Tuesday, May 3, 2016 3:41:38 PM CDT Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:23 PM, <arm_ml@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi there,
now the board is on my table.
The only image i've found is
linaro-desktop-cubietruck-plus-card-dp-v1.1.img. But I don't think its a
real aarch64 Image:
linaro@cubietruck-plus:~$ uname -a
Linux cubietruck-plus 3.4.39 #7 SMP PREEMPT Tue Mar 1 09:34:33 CST 2016
armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux
linaro@cubietruck-plus:~$
I think this should be armv8l ?
Is there any howto to create/build a aarch64 Image on a Cubieboard 5
with
Fedora ?
Is this a real aarch64 board? As far as I can tell [1], although their
website is terrible on the details, it's a ARMv7 device not a aarch64
device.
It is only armv7 I have one at home, last I tried it there was some
issues
still. I will try when I get home and see how it works now.
Dennis
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Dennis,
that would be fine.
Greetings
Andreas
I put last nights rawhide minimal image on, the output was serial port only.
HDMI had nothing, I do not have a monitor with DP support so I can not see if
something is coming out there, the system booted but hung when it got to
[ OK ] Reached target Basic System.
The CubieTruck Plus uses an A83T for which only quite minimal support is
in the upstream kernel. mmc support still is waiting for merging, so no
rootfs, so this makes sense.
Also no video output support whatsoever yet.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
