On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Clive Messer <clive.m.messer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 09:44 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> Yet you com in very confrontational about it, > > I am sorry if you see it that way. Blunt and to the point, yes, but I > wasn't trying to be confrontational, just trying to make a point, that > I do not understand the concept of a community based distribution being > released, only officially supporting big $$$$$, business class, > enterprise solutions, rather than the consumer level boards which are > already available. Your email seem to imply that the community somehow excludes enterprise level contributors. That's not the case at all. The community around ARM is just as diverse as it is around x86, where you have contributors from all different areas. You might not have intended it to imply that, but it's the message those enterprise contributors see. It's really hard to encourage more of them to participate when people constantly question their validity in our community. Your message would have been better served by simply asking if there are plans around supporting the 96Board stuff. josh _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
