On Wednesday, September 02, 2015 04:45:33 PM Till Maas wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 01:38:21PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > Without a battery backed RTC its really not that useful. Picture 6 or 10 > > months after a release, does it matter if the time is half a year to a > > year > > off or 35 years off? > > If a system needs to use something TLS-protected, then the system clock > must not be too much off because a certificate might not be valid > otherwise. At least in debian there is also a fake hwclock package that > reduces the offset to the time that passed since the system was last > booted: Sure, but is there uses for TLS without the network having come up? at which point chronyd would have set the time correctly. Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
