On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> > I have built and posted a Fedora 22 Docker base image for ARM that matches >>>> > the one on x86_64. it can be found >>>> > https://ausil.us/fedora-arm/22/Docker/armhfp/ >>>> First and foremost, this is awesome! Thanks for doing this. :) >>>> >>>> Second .... >>>> >>>> Is this something that could be pushed up to the Docker hub under the >>>> Fedora namespace? Just slap a armhfp (or $similar) tag on it with >>>> appropriate documentation that it's meant to be used for ARM? >>> I am sure we can, there is a bunch of arm images up there already, we would >>> just need to do it. I am not 100% sure how to do so. >>> >> >> I don't mind following up on this, but I'm curious what the preference >> would be. Should Fedora ARM have it's own "namespace" or should it >> just be a repository within the Fedora namespace on the hub? >> >> Ie. >> >> FROM feodra/armhfp >> >> vs >> >> FROM fedora-arm >> >> In a Dockerfile. > > It's probably a decision we need to make for all architectures. I > expect there to be docker support for aarch64/ppc64/ppc64le in the > F-23 timeline so it's probably a good idea to make an overall decision > and process for these. > +1 - I'll start a thread on devel@fp.o about that. -AdamM > Peter _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
