-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 05/11/2015 11:15 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> I see a lot of attempts to build 'seqan' on aarch64 architecture; >> it's impossible for now. Are they automated? > > Yes. It doesn't look that impossible as it's only a single test > that fails. Is it fixed in 2.0? > > http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5362/2995362/build.log No, > unfortunately. > >> Since some days, there are also some 'sundials-2.6.1-6' rebuilds >> on aarch64; they will fail every time because of a bad testing. >> Yesterday i have built a new packaging release of 'sundials' >> that should be packaged successfully even on aarch64. > > What's the new NVR for sundials? It should filter through once it > goes through updates etc on mainline. sundials-2.6.1-7 may be built correctly on aarch64. > > Peter > - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVUO4VAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8DskH/3n0Rg2qiKy85JgIG8m6RIAt wh15qWA72y1zh3ChnErzD8ZWKPtL8YegMUalM4UMzy7ovGLxg3DjNIa9QFet0hwg j2bbNK19Ts6CZlusNIRMNyvTBdqcYKiEjpnr4AqxVv7Wu8B/2ZzNgEnUMWKKC2lu Nz0/MfM49c24586YQaZzFVIQmU3mujG1k0WjwI13CSZlFfxcqCyT0ckj7/Akga5U NUZcjYbFcCAXQwGKCKLhNkVMfeqDWT3co4KSpwtJn6BOJXQq7iU7eJDfdf4v1IN1 TtpZz8viI4dMsY/T2Q6o+gO2PjUvfpkUw8YyJpkFqIt1zlciaqsDudiTPvtduW8= =tmON -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
