On 02/06/2015 05:33 PM, Troy Dawson wrote: > On 02/05/2015 08:28 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> On 02/05/2015 05:48 PM, Troy Dawson wrote: >>> pcduino3 nano has SATA and Gbit ethernet and is only $4 more expensive >>> than the Raspberry Pi. I like it. I'm not sure why it's not more >>> popular. Maybe cuz it's hard to say. >> >> Very nice. Does F21 minimal run on it? Does Rawhide support its video? >> >> I do not see a barrel power plug, so power only through the OTG? >> >> Also this price seems to be for the board alone? So you have to add in >> a power cable and the special SATA cable (my Cubies come with both of >> these). >> > > Correct. Only power through the OTG. > (Actually both micro-usb ports, but I suppose you should use the one > designed for it.) > > Correct. Price is only for the board, no cables. > > I have F20 minimal on one that I've been using for a build server for a > couple of months. > > I have put F21 minimal on the other one I have. But I'm really using > the kernel that comes with it. > http://www.yortnoswad.org/blog/2014/10/29/fedora-on-pcduino3-nano/ > > This weekend I'm hoping to have time to mess with it again. I want to > get it to run Fedora's kernel. I plan on trying rawhide on it. > > Troy > I just realized that I didn't ever reply to this. I wasn't able to get it to book rawhide's kernel on the machine. But I think that is more because I'm not the best at uboot and kernels. I did find out some things though, uboot - pcDuino3 Nano support in version v2015.04 kernel - should be in 3.21 http://linux-sunxi.org/LinkSprite_pcDuino3_Nano Fedora userspace runs just fine though. Troy >> >>> >>> Troy >>> >>> On 02/04/2015 02:17 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >>>> No SATA, no USB3.0 and only 100 Mbit ethernet. >>>> So for storage you are limited to a USB hard disk or a (fast) SDHC card. >>>> Then again at this pricepoint it will be quite popular. >>>> >>>> Banana pi, orange pi etc, are all somewhat more expensive but have SATA >>>> and Gbit ethernet. >>>> >>>> 2015-02-04 20:28 GMT+01:00 Andrew Gillis <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> <mailto:andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>: >>>> >>>> That's correct. There is no SATA interface on the Raspberry Pi 2. >>>> >>>> -Andrew >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Robert Moskowitz >>>> <rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 02/04/2015 10:43 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> As a follow up of the discussion that happened at the last >>>> ARM meeting >>>> (and because 3 days post announcement of it I'm sick of >>>> repeating >>>> myseld:-P ) I thought I'd outline the process for getting >>>> support for >>>> the Raspberry Pi 2 into Fedora >>>> >>>> >>>> Just a small question... >>>> >>>> I have not found a schematic, but the pics do not seem to >>>> show a >>>> SATA interface. Is this correct? >>>> >>>> No SATA, I have no time for it; I am already crunched for time. >>>> >>>> Though it would be nice. >>>> _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
