ExcludeArch tracker doesn't appear to be effective

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485251 is depressing. Nine 
bugs have been closed - of these, one is a review request that was 
dropped, two were incorrectly closed after an ExcludeArch was added and 
one was closed as a duplicate. Further, one bug was just unsubscribed 
from the tracker after tests were disabled. We've correctly fixed *five* 
packages that have been flagged as FTBFS on ARM. At this rate of fixing, 
and given the rate at which new bugs are added, ARM will never build the 
entire archive.

Fedora is supposed to provide a consistent experience across primary 
architectures. Having a subset of our packages fail to build on ARM 
means that's not true, and the current state of affairs clearly violates 
point 8 of the architecture promotion requirements. How can we fix this?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux