On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Peter TB Brett <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> Just wanted to check whether anybody had tried Fedora 19 on the Pandaboard >> A6. >> >> Since the Pandaboard A3 worked well with Fedora 19, we tried it with the A6 >> but we seem to be running into some difficulties. >> >> Does anybody know if the Pandaboard A6 suffers from the same issues as with >> the Pandaboard ES B3? > > Really an A6? Great, svtronics knows no one works for pandaboard.org > anymore... ;) > > What's the memory ID on top of the chip? Should be fine, support was added last summer, so v2013.10 or greater.. http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commitdiff;h=7d47d1caa01682fd7b12631409927139f09ba041 With device tree, it must load "omap4-panda-a4.dtb" Regards, -- Robert Nelson http://www.rcn-ee.com/ _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
