On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > El Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:17:22 +0000 > Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> escribió: >> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:50:29 +0100 >> > Vratislav Podzimek <vpodzime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> >> On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 14:47 +0100, Dan Horák wrote: >> >> > On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:41:15 +0100 >> >> > Vratislav Podzimek <vpodzime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > s390(x) cannot boot from an iSCSI disk. >> >> > >> >> > what about other arches eg. ARM? >> >> Is there any bug on that? And any HW/person for testing? >> > >> > I think boot from iSCSI should be enabled only for positive list of >> > arches (like x86, ppc), I guess it requires special support in >> > device firmware >> > >> > the Fedora/ARM list is in on CC >> >> It depends, you can boot using an initrd with SW iSCSI support (either >> off a local card or via netboot) and have the rootfs on an iSCSI LUN >> and there's a few people have done that with the Trimslice as a PCIe >> attached gig interface tends to be faster than usb2 attached SSD. >> >> If you mean via an iSCSI HW device with appropriate firmware and >> firmware provided iSCSI LUN where the OS just sees the usual /dev/sdX >> style devices we don't currently see that functionality but I wouldn't >> be surprised if it was available of some Server SoCs soon. > > I don't know of any u-boot supoort for iscsi, but its always > possible. I expect that aarch64 from day 1 will support iSCSI. I think > that the 32 bit devices that have UEFI should have support also. I wasn't referring to iSCSI via uboot, there's other means of achieving it. _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
