On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Clive Messer <clive.m.messer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 11:08 -0500, Jon wrote: >> Whoa! >> You have graphics working, but kernel 3.0.35! >> Does that kernel have all the filesystem capabilities to make Fedora happy? >> Extended attr's, ACLs, selinux, cgroups, etc.... > > I've been shipping a 3.0.35 kernel with the F18/F19 images used by the > Community Squeeze project since we switched to a Fedora based image back > in February. www.communitysqueeze.org > > I'm guessing if I factor in that most of our users have downloaded at > least 3 images, we currently have 20, maybe 30, Wandboard users running > a Fedora based distro. I expect this will be 100's, (rather than 10's), > of users at the point that our hardware (John Swenson designed DAC > carrier board) is manufactured and available. > >> Does anybody know what it would take to get frame buffer support in >> 3.11 or 3.12? >> Maybe we just enable Stephen Warren's simple framebuffer driver? (aka >> SIMPLE_FB) >> Just wondering.... > > Robert Nelsons 3.11 kernel build has Wandboard HDMI output working with > this patch.... > > https://github.com/RobertCNelson/armv7-multiplatform/blob/v3.11.x/patches/imx_video/0001-imx-video-staging-Add-HDMI-support-to-imx-drm-driver.patch > > No idea whether that has been submitted to the gregkh staging tree yet. The author "Tony Prisk" on the wandboard forums has been working on ^^^^ driver. I'm getting the feeling he is more interested in getting it perfect first before sending it out to the staging tree. Regards, -- Robert Nelson http://www.rcn-ee.com/ _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
