On 09/04/2013 02:47 PM, Mark Salter wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 21:58 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 04.09.2013 14:08, Brendan Conoboy pisze:
Total current build failure count: 851 failed
Build failures from unsatisfied dependencies: 357 failed-dep-rpms
See http://arm-temp.ausil.us/pub/fedora-arm/data/failed-dep-rpms for complete list.
Build failures after dependency resolution: 494 failed-build-rpms
See http://arm-temp.ausil.us/pub/fedora-arm/data/failed-build-rpms for complete list.
acpid is on a list. But:
[builder@model-1 SPECS]$ rpmbuild acpid.spec
warning: bogus date in %changelog: Thu Oct 23 2007 Zdenek Prikryl
<zprikryl@xxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.6-3.fc9
[builder@model-1 SPECS]$ vi acpid.spec
[builder@model-1 SPECS]$ rpmbuild -ba acpid.spec
error: Architecture is not included: aarch64
So it should be removed.
Yeah. There are about 100 packages failing for same reason. Some are
are packages we'd want to port, others don't make sense for aarch64.
The scripts are crude. We could add a blacklist or query src.rpm, but
if we move to koji soon, it doesn't matter.
BTW, the scripts are on the server at:
http://arm-temp.ausil.us/pub/fedora-arm/bin/
Actually, this package needs to stay for AArch64; ACPI will
be in use. It's on my list of things to do to fix this.
--
ciao,
al
-----------------------------------
Al Stone
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
ahs3@xxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
