Re: Criteria for adding new ARM boards to F20 support list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/14/2013 04:09 PM, Omalley_s wrote:
Just a suggestion, two developers with the actual board in hand for
testing and qa purposes. The reason for two I simply sometimes a single
developer can't keep up for personaland maybe there should be a "working
group".

The should be a working but not officially supported cat catagory, and a
works but not officially supported.

Yeah, I think that's reasonable. This is perhaps a QE question more than anything. If the ARM team represents something works we should make sure the QE team has enough hardware and time to properly verify.

--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux