Re: Fedora 19 TC6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 06/25/2013 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:28:00 +0200
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

On 06/21/2013 05:35 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi All,

http://armpkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/stage/19-TC6/

is a TC6 Final compose, We still have a bit to get done in a really
short period of time. lets get testing and bug reports in.

I've ran my "Fedora armhfp to Fedora Allwinner A10" script on the
XFCE image, and done some testing with that. Here are my findings:

-Overall it looks very good!
-Can we make the image 4G instead of 8 again please, writing 8G
   take ages (4G only takes halve an age) ?
-Can we use uboot and rootfs as fslabels again please, __ and
   __boot are *ugly* ?
-There is no poweroff/shutdown option in the poweroff menu
   of lightdm, instead I get suspend and hibernate as only options.
   This may be related to the Allwinner specific kernel I'm using,
   or it could be a generic problem with lightdm using an x86
   specific method to determine which buttons to show...
-The first time I log into XFCE, choose default panel, and then
   logout again, I end up with no panel. Removing all the config
   for the user and doing it again fixes this. Am I the only one
   seeing this?

I've not yet filed bugs for any of these, if you believe I
should file bugs, please let me know.

Regards,

Hans

Its now too late, you should have filed bugs.

I understand, but the reason for me not filing them still exists,
mainly where and against which component do I fie arm image bugs?

 because you cc'd me on
the email it got filtered elsewhere in a folder full of spam and i only
saw it because I cleaned out the spam and noticed. please do not cc me
on list emails. we are making 8gb images for F19

Why are we making 8GB images, is 4GB too small? or ... ?

I would really like to see this fixed for F-20, where and against which
component do I file a bug for this?

disk label will not
be changing, as hiopped the images use UUID's appliance-creator sets
the labels based on mount point, im not going to write support to set
labels.

Again I would really like to see this fixed for F-20, where and against
which component do I file a bug for this?

> as to poweroff/shutdown, it needs debugging, but RC1 final
images are compressing now.

Ok.

> ive not seen the XFCE issue, but without a
bug its impossible to track or get on the radar for fixing.

Well it is hard to reproduce for me too, which is why I wanted to gather
more data first.

Regards,

Hans
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux