Re: Issues to solve before F19 ARM GA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/25/2013 10:15 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
General image issues:
  o LVM console spam on first boot
  o The initial-setup does not appear to run

Paul is looking into these. If anybody else is investigating either please let him know.

  o Restorecon runs on first boot- can we avoid this?

After a discussion with others it appears we could avoid this by running restorecon in %post, or otherwise having the image generation tools run restorecon for us. We would be doing a service to end users' sd write cycles by doing so. Dennis?

Versatile express:
  o No u-boot - would be nice to have for virt integration
  o No boot-vexpress script or pre-extracted kernels - was in F18.

No update here. We are building a uboot for versatile express, but it does not appear to function.

  o No graphics support - regression since F18 (Kernel 3.6)

Kyle is looking into this and may have an update next week.

TI Boards in general:
  o Images, as distributed, need manual steps to be made bootable.
  o An easy script to handle the manual steps is not yet available.
  o Supplied vfat partition possibly badly formed.

Some have suggested using fossjon's livemedia-modifier script. Can somebody comment here?

  o No graphics - regression since F18 (Kernel 3.6)

Jon is looking into this for Panda only. He should have an update later today.

OMAP3 (Beagle boards):
  o The supplied uboot does not load boot.scr.

This is for Dennis.

  o The supplied kernel fails to boot.

Nobody is looking at this that I am aware of.

AM335x (Beagle bone boards):
  o Missing kernel support - this is probably an F19 remix or F20 feature.

Let's forget about this for F19, the kernel just isn't ready.

Tegra2 (Trimslice, specifically)
  o SSD support is unreliable due to evident hardware bug.

This might be addressable by "hdparm -a 32". Or, less likely, tweaking /sys/block/sda/queue/read_ahead_kb. Would somebody with a trimslice-pro try this out and confirm?

  o X, though functional, is not stable.

Nobody is looking at this that I am aware of.

Anaconda installs:
  o a-b-c needs to be run manually in %post

I'll look into this.

--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux