Re: CONFIG_LATENCYTOP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/10/2013 03:55 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> Currently, 32-bit ARM LATENCYTOP support is dependent upon !SMP.
> Separately, I have been screening through all of the discrepancies
> between x86_64 and AArch64 and have already identified this as a feature
> enhancement needed for 64-bit. I have that, and a laundry list of
> related features that I will be raising with ARM/Linaro elsewhere.
> 
> Jon.
> 

Thanks for this info


-- 
John Brier, RHCA, RHCVA, RHCX
Quality Assurance Engineer - NA
gpg: 1024D/251D9FF9 6F7B 242A 9375 F4CC BC6D  F453 60D8 35FF 251D 9FF9

http://opensource.com - Where Open Source Multiplies
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux