On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 09:13:30PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 02:02:12PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > I would feel extremely bad if I pushed something to git that didn't even
> > > > pass 'make prep'. As a compromise, I added this line in kernel.spec:
> > > >
> > > > @@ -1451,6 +1451,8 @@ mkdir configs
> > > > rm -f kernel-%{version}-*debug.config
> > > > %endif
> > > >
> > > > +rm -f kernel-%{version}-arm*.config
> > > > +
> > > > # now run oldconfig over all the config files
> > > >
> > > > So the ARM configs won't be included in the prep run. That lets things
> > > > progress on all the other arches for now. Just remove that line, fix
> > > > things up, and push out.
> > >
> > > FYI, I've just done the same thing in f18 during the 3.9 rebase.
> > > I don't see us pushing this out until 3.9.1 lands, but please sort out the
> > > config options there too.
> >
> > Thanks, I'll look at it now, for <= F-18 we still support v5tel so I
> > need to deal with that.
> >
> > Any idea on eta for 3.9.1?
>
> Probably sometime this week I would guess. There's already over a hundred
> patches queued on Linux-stable for 3.9
>
> Greg typically seems to wait until Linus tags rc1, so whenever the merge
> window closes, you can probably expect 3.9.1 to land pretty soon afterwards.
I'm kinda hesitant on that plan. We seem to always pull in some
patches from -rc1 that wind up being broken and fixed with a later RC,
or reverted outright. Of course, there isn't a great answer there but
maybe we can bump the karma requirement up when the update is filed?
josh
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
