Re: Build log for aarch64 failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> --- On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> | aarch64 does not equate to arm-koji. aarch64 doesn't have a koji infra
> | yet as we're not to that stage of the bringup of the platform.
> \--
>
> I see.
>
> ---
> | The reason the bug was filed is that to build on aarch64 platforms
> | there needs to be a newer version of config.guess/config.sub or
> | autoreconf needs to be run with the latest releases to ensure the
> | supporting bits are there. We used an automated script and packages
> | that don't appear to have the needed bits got a bug report. In some
> | cases there are false positives.
> \--
>
> So, to be on the safer side, is it recommended to rebuild the package
> with "autoconf"?

"autoreconf -vif" is probably the best option.

Peter
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux