On 27 Mar 2013 03:38, "Nicolas Pitre" <nico@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>
> > We could create a number of uboot headers. Then after loading the default
> > uImage, load a separate uboot header overwriting the first 64 bytes of RAM.
>
> Please don't engage in those senseless games just to work around a
> stupid restriction of the uImage file format.
>
> If uImage is a problem, just don't use it, period. Problem solved. All
> the targets supported by the unified kernel are recent enough to have
> bootz support in their U-Boot source. Please use that.
Can you substantiate "recent enough"? The bootz option was in my mind but I have no recollection of how recently it was introduced.
> Or, consider the mkimage process as part of the kernel _installation_
> procedure and not a pre-distribution step. But if I were you I'd go the
> bootz route for its simplicity.
>
>
> Nicolas
> _______________________________________________
> arm mailing list
> arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
_______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
