Hi Brendan, On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Brendan Conoboy <blc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/26/2013 06:09 PM, Graeme Russ wrote: >> >> I've had a quick glance at the U-Boot source and I think the newer >> 'FIT' image may be a better path to follow. In common/image.c you will >> find fit_image_get_load() and in common/cmd_bootm.c you will find >> bootm_start() and bootm_load_os(). Teasing apart these functions, it >> looks like fit_image_get_load() looks for a "load" property >> (FIT_LOAD_PROP) in the FDT first, then in the FIT image (if the FDT >> returns a NULL load address). >> >> Now you can set properties in the FDT in U-Boot (fdt set <path> <prop> >> [<val>]) >> >> So have a common FIT image with a common FDT and use U-Boot to tweak >> the FDT properties such as the kernel load address > > > I'd love to, but we don't ship uboot for a number of our boards. We are > limited to the functionality provided by the firmware provided. FIT is not > universal. Well at least you can have a common image for all U-Boot boards :) I suppose the 64-byte header per-board would work. Ugly, but not as ugly as some of the other options. You could also make a small mod to U-Boot to allow the load address of legacy images to be changed via a command to make the hack slightly less ugly Regards, Graeme _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
