Re: Patching aarch64 support into Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Brendan Conoboy <blc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/06/2013 06:37 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>
>> I say we need the list of packages effected. then we can evaluate how
>> critical it is that we take action.
>
>
> Here is the initial list:
>
> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~blc/fedora-arm/patchify/configure.pkgs
>
> I think it may actually be much larger.  Al and I are going back and forth
> on fixing up patchify to identify more cases.

Ultimately there's a number of things like alsa* globus* as well as a
lot of X related stuff where upstream should be contacted because they
do have regular releases so there's no reason why they shouldn't be
fixed by default from upstream.

Peter
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux