2012/12/15 Chris Tyler <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 10:10 +0000, Gordan Bobic wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've been trying to google this and I haven't been able to find a >> definitive answer on the subject. I seem to recall a discussion on this >> list a while back, with the general conclusion being that this is >> problematic, but my googling threw up a few pages about Debian implying >> that it could be made to work. >> >> Has anybody got any words of wisdom on this subject they might care to >> share? I am mainly interested in this from the point of view of running >> a Fedora chroot under Android with VNC on loopback on a Nexus 10. > > > Since the kernel interfaces are not affected by the ABI choice, a > properly set-up chroot with a different ABI from the native ABI of the > system should work fine. Exactly. On a panda board for example, it possible to run all combinations of chroots created with a gcc built with --with-float=softfp or --with-float=hard --with-mode=thumb or --with-mode=arm --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 or --with-fpu=neon Those I know for sure, as I did build all combinations some time ago. > We used this during the armv7hl bring-up and still use it occasionally > for composing; I think Jon Chiappetta is using it for the armv6hl work > as well. > > -Chris Paulo _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
