Hi Mark, Would love feedback on the 3.7-rc7 unified kernel on Calxeda HW. http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=102860 Cheers, Peter On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is the 3.7 suitable for testing? Last time I tried, it was still in bad shape. > > If it's good for testing, I'll throw it on a node tomorrow and send some results. > > --Mark Langsdorf > Calxeda, Inc. > > ________________________________________ > From: arm-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [arm-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter Robinson [pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 2:59 AM > To: arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: ARM kernel moving forward 3.7+ > > Hi All, > > I'm assuming since you've all been so quiet that the 3.7 kernel works > perfectly for the intended platforms (versatile/highbank to date) and > that we don't need to do anything what so ever moving forward (ROTFLOL > here!) or else no one other than Paul has bothered to test it (Calxeda > I am glaring at you). I would like to get this bolted down sooner > rather than later as I really don't want another repeat of 3.6. > > Looking at post 3.7 I'm already starting to poke around and prep > things. Similar to x86-32 I'm aiming to basically have an armv7 and an > armv7-PAE kernel. The PAE kernel will support LPAE and the various > virt things that are starting to land in the kernel now so it will be > solely for A15 chipsets. I presume the Exynos5 supports those > features. > > So with that I'd like some feedback from the mainline kernels guys or > anyone else that is a kernelly dev sort of person with for/against > suggestions and thoughts. > > Peter > _______________________________________________ > arm mailing list > arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
