On 11/29/2012 04:32 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Please take a look at the attached. Note that the default kernel variant >> is actually a versatile, and you weren't inheriting that. Also, we need >> to set the V6_V7 multiplatform option because the current Kconfig logic >> will otherwise enable AUTO CPU support, which will force us to have a V5 >> kernel. So take a look. I'll be online later. >> >> Tested with a cross compiler only, but it built. > > A couple of things: > > This is incorrect as we've uncoupled the unified from the rest of the > kernel to simplify and clean up the build. > -temp-armv7l-versatile: config-arm-versatile temp-arm-generic > +temp-armv7l-versatile: config-armv7 config-arm-versatile temp-arm-generic But, the unified kernel is the default kernel, right? As in kernel- is the unified kernel? That one is currently a versatile kernel. It is, if you look in Makefile.config pulling its config from the versatile config files per the above, which without explicitly pulling in config-armv7 means that you get whatever versatile turns on for you, and certainly none of the intended config-armv7 bits. Unless I am missing something, there's a bug in the existing config merging that is actually the root cause here. Please explain what you are trying to do with joining these if I am wrong. > Apologies for this one as I assumed the V7 multi would depend or > automatically set this and it wasn't in the original unified config > from Arnd. > +CONFIG_CPU_V7=y It wasn't clear this was always the case from looking at the logic. > And I removed this as I assumed "CONFIG_ARCH_MULTI_V7" was all we > wanted for a V7 kernel. > +CONFIG_ARCH_MULTI_V6_V7=y Yea, that one is definitely something we need to set. Jon. _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
