On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Scott Sullivan <scott@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/24/2012 11:11 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> Already aware of it. After all it went via the board for approval first >> ;-) >> >> I was actually working on packaging the firmware this morning so I can >> build a 3.7 kernel for it in rawhide. >> >> Peter >> > [...] > >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: [Fedora-legal-list] Update to Binary Firmware Exceptions >>> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:56:24 -0400 >>> From: Tom Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> To: legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devel-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> Two minor exceptions have been added to the Licensing Guidelines: > > [...] > > How does today's announcement of Open-source Userland / Driver code > integrate with this? > > http://www.raspberrypi.org/archives/2221 > > Does it make the issue moot going forward? Or is the issue with the binary > bootloader blob? The issue is with the bootloader blob. Even with today's announcement the device wouldn't be useful without the blob. The "first completely open platform" is a bit misleading with regards to the announcement. The firmware exception has been in discussion for quite some time so it's not linked with today's announcement from the RPi foundation. Peter _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
