On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Al Stone <ahs3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/18/2012 01:18 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> >> On 18 Oct 2012 20:29, "Jurgen Kramer" <gtmkramer@xxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:gtmkramer@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 10:21 -0600, Al Stone wrote: >> > > On 10/18/2012 09:44 AM, Jurgen Kramer wrote: >> > > > On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 16:34 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> > > >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Jurgen Kramer >> <gtmkramer@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gtmkramer@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> > > >>> I am trying to get Fedora running on the cubox. I am getting >> close but >> > > >>> no cigar yet. >> > > >> > > I haven't had much luck yet, either, but I also haven't been able to >> > > spend a great deal of time with my CuBox (maybe all of an hour so >> > > far). I've been attempting an f17 rootfs, though. >> > > >> > > Is there some place I can go to and pick up the kernel/initrd you've >> > > got and try it so that I can replicate what you're seeing? Or, are >> you >> > > just using the kernel source from SolidRun? >> > > >> > I got a bit further by using different memory addresses for the kernel >> > and initrd. Systemd now starts but complains about missing autofs4 and >> > cgroups. >> > As kernel source and config I am using the SolidRun kernel sources >> > enhanced with several patches (https://github.com/vDorst/linux) . >> > >> > I'll put up the kernel/initrd once it's done compiling with cgroups and >> > autofs4 enabled. >> > >> > What would be needed for Fedora to support the CuBox? CuBox support is >> > not upstream (yet). >> >> Upstream support in a unified kernel. From the little I've read Marvell >> plans on supporting this as part of the mvebu support as they mention >> supporting dove as part of it which is what I think the cubox is based on. > > > I don't know about the unified part, but I'll look into that. > > I'm pretty sure the CuBox is a Marvell Armada 510 SoC (single CPU > version of the Armada XP 4-CPU chip). In theory, it should even be > able to use the Armada XP kernel -- or so I've been told :). It is an Armada 510 which is very similar to the Armada 610 in the OLPC XO 1.75 and I believe this generation / series of chips is known as Dove and it's code name is MMP2 (side note the XO-4 is MMP3). In theory they will be able to use the XP kernel but I don't believe that is the case at the moment at least from an upstream perspective. There was a post as part of the XP upstreaming that mentioned they were going to merge Kirkwood, Dove, XP etc into a single supported mvebu (marvell embedded business unit) set of devices. Peter _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm