On 10/05/2012 07:34 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> For Fedora 18 with 3.7 it should (whether it works out in time or we >> start with F-19 and roll it back) mean we can support more devices >> with a couple of less kernels. The mvebu platform is the Marvell > > F18 is going to GA with 3.6.x. We'll rebase to 3.7 at some point, but > it won't be until after the release. If you're wanting to do this on a > release boundary, F19 would be your target. If you're OK with rolling > it out as an update, then F18 is doable. Just an FYI. We're planning on a 3.7 update in F18. The thing is that this is likely to be a disruptive upgrade as certain platforms (even without a unified kernel) will need to have a working device tree. Hence, the moment there is an -rc1 to poke at, we'll make sure this is lined up. A quick update on the kernel, since I've been giving it love (and will allocate time each week to do so going forward). I currently believe that the latest test build fixes everything but USB on PandaBoard (that issue is likely to be a USB hub initialization problem - there are two possible GPIOs and one clock source Dave Anders is looking into as the TI maintainer involved - because the smsc95xx is on an internal bus): http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1175808 I just need Josh to fix the module signing patch per kernel@ Jon. _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
