On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Jon Chiappetta <Jon.Chiappetta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ok so my quest for more reasonable build time comparisons is still going. I > must be really bad at this... So I tried two new versions of the script, one > which just took PA's longest buildarch time and SA's shortest buildarch > time, however, the overall times summed up turned out to be way too > favorable on our behalf. The latest version now sums up the buildarch times > and divides them by how many of them there were. I think its a bit better > because the faster builders with faster build times will pull up the slower > build times, essentially its just an average calculation. The offset now for > us looks like around 15 days (half a month slower)? Anyway, the page is the > same. I still haven't filtered out our slowest builders from this list > either so the number of days could probably go down if I did. Let me know if > these numbers seem a bit more reasonable! > > http://142.204.133.82/jon/builds/times.html BTW how hard would it be to add the two builders (hardfp/softfp) in a "notes" field at the end? Peter _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
