On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 10:40 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 04/23/2012 10:36 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote: > > Andrew Haley wrote: > >> On 04/23/2012 02:16 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > >>> As we get closer to having 100% package coverage in F17-ARM we're > >>> running into harder build failures due to the limitations of the chips > >>> we're building for. The problem I've noticed on many of the recent > >>> failures is due to the lack of atomic operations (These didn't arrive > >>> until ARMv6). How do we want to handle this? I see a few options: > >>> > >>> 1. Abandon armv5 and move to armv6 where some of the operations we need > >>> are available. This will still support the raspberry pi- what about > >>> kirkwood *plugs? > >> > >> Hold on, I thought that Raspberry Pi was a separate remix, and F17 > >> was targeted at ARMv7? > > > > Oh? My understanding was that F17 was to have both armv5tel and armv7hl > > builds. > > Oh, I see. Is any of this documented anywhere? > > And can someone tell me if there is a F17 root fs for Raspberry Pi that > I can download? There are armv5tel and armv7hl builds for F17. The Raspbery Pi remix is the armv5tel build + some packages that can't be accepted in Fedora (due to license issues, e.g., non-open-source libraries). Brendan has *just* added the Pi as a target for his nightly rootfs images, but this hasn't been tested yet. This will be a bit different from the final image but will let anyone who wants to play early. (/me toddles off to test that out...) -Chris _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
