Re: heavybuilders cdot-pandas

[M Abed <maxamaxim@xxxxxx>]

Does that mean that we will remove the following machines from the heavybuilder channel or leave those as is?

cdot-panda-10-1-v7hl

cdot-panda-10-4-v7hl

cdot-panda-10-5

cdot-panda-11-4-v7hl

cdot-panda-12-3

cdot-panda-5-3

cdot-panda-5-4

Thanks

Masihul Max Abed

Seneca CDOT

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Brendan Conoboy <blc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 02/27/2012 02:25 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
[snip]

I wanted to get others thoughs before i went and made the change

Just to be clear, these two systems are the same machines:

hsv-trimslice-9-v5tel        N   N    0.0/2.0 arm              -
hsv-trimslice-9-v7hl         Y   N    2.0/2.0 armhfp 2012-02-27 22:04:45

We just provision them as v5 or v7 according to what it looks like is needed.  That's the idea anyway- we aren't doing enough builds at once that we've had to balance anything.

FYI, the HSV pandas also have dedicated sata disks on them and are roughly the performance equivalent of the trimslices because of it.  The actual tally of heavybuilders (defined as having dedicated usb-sata storage) is:

hsv-panda-1-v5tel
hsv-panda-2-v5tel
hsv-panda-3-v5tel
hsv-panda-5-v5tel
hsv-panda-6-v5tel
hsv-panda-8-v5tel
cdot-trimslice-13-1
cdot-trimslice-14-1-v7hl
hsv-trimslice-10-{v5tel,v7hl}
hsv-trimslice-9-{v5tel,v7hl}
hsv-trimslice-8-{v5tel,v7hl}
hsv-trimslice-7-{v5tel,v7hl}
hsv-trimslice-6-{v5tel,v7hl}

We can make all the HSV trimslices into v7 builders and that will give us a 6/6 split, which seems reasonable.

--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@xxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm

_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm