On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 21:55 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 21:48 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 15:03 -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > > > > > - we've pruned the package sets back to the same core > > > > I think this is straightforward. We include in the repos only the build > > requirements to build a buildroot and start with that. Do some closure > > tests on that set and make sure the same packages exist for v5 and v7. I > > suspect someone could turn that around tomorrow. > > Rewording this to make more sense, what I mean is: > > 1). Establish correctly named mirrors in Seneca of the arm and armhfp > form, in which the exact same packages are present in both. Initially > form this simply by removing packages not in both v5 and v7 now. That > ought to be fairly simply (DJ's script output can help there). > > 2). With all of those packages possibly available, start by building > only a buildroot and its deps. If that works, it's a great achievement. > I would ideally like us to reach this point before US Thanksgiving takes > a bunch of us offline this time next week. I think it's doable. 3). With a minimal buildroot (a subset of stage3, which was to get mock working but wound up also making a bootable system - though stage3 is fine too for simplicity as a set to built initially) set of packages built, set that up as a new repo and have it favored in preference to the external one for building the rest. Then a mass rebuild of packages present in v5 and v7 from the external repos can begin. Jon. _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
