On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 07:44:02 +0100, Henrik Nordström <henrik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > tis 2011-11-08 klockan 15:05 -0800 skrev Brendan Conoboy: > >> Per our IRC conversation, the second patch in 50521, "patch to >> honour >> STRICT_ALIGNMENT," breaks the gcc build. Midway through, xgcc is >> used >> to generate an executable which segfaults. The build works with >> 50521's >> "proposal patch" however. I have not tested the result. > > It's the first "proposal patch" that I worry about. > > As discussed in the PR the second patch is a separate problem and do > not > belong here and should be moved to a PR of it's own (alignment in > general). But it is possible armv5 may need something like this in > some > cases, I do not know. Speaking of alignment, armv5 has been in need of a GCC option to force 4-byte alignment of all arrays (including char[] arrays) and structs since forever. Arguably, it should be on by default on arm. But I guess that is unrelated to this particular alignment issue. Gordan _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
