Re: Busybox on ARM, possible GCC issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:31:47 +0100, Peter Robinson
>  <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>  On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:49:01 +0100, Peter Robinson
>>>  <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>  Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>  I've been trying to get busybox to build on Fedora ARM and I've
>>>>> vixed a
>>>>>  few issues with the RPM, but one still remains:
>>>>>
>>>>>   /builddir/build/BUILD/busybox-1.15.1/scripts/trylink
>>>>>  "busybox_unstripped" "gcc" " -Wall -Wshadow -Wwrite-strings
>>>>> -Wundef
>>>>>  -Wstrict-prototypes -Wunused -Wunused-parameter -Wunused-function
>>>>>  -Wunused-value -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations
>>>>>  -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wold-style-definition
>>>>> -fno-builtin-strlen
>>>>>  -finline-limit=0 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffunction-sections
>>>>>  -fdata-sections -fno-guess-branch-probability -funsigned-char
>>>>>  -static-libgcc -falign-functions=1 -falign-jumps=1
>>>>> -falign-labels=1
>>>>>  -falign-loops=1 -Os  -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
>>>>>  -fno-stack-protector -static -nostartfiles
>>>>>  -LuClibc-0.9.30.1/installed/lib
>>>>> uClibc-0.9.30.1/installed/lib/crt1.o
>>>>>  uClibc-0.9.30.1/installed/lib/crti.o
>>>>>  uClibc-0.9.30.1/installed/lib/crtn.o" " " " applets/built-in.o" "
>>>>>  archival/lib.a  archival/libunarchive/lib.a  console-tools/lib.a
>>>>>  coreutils/lib.a  coreutils/libcoreutils/lib.a  debianutils/lib.a
>>>>>  e2fsprogs/lib.a  editors/lib.a  findutils/lib.a  init/lib.a
>>>>>  libbb/lib.a
>>>>>  libpwdgrp/lib.a  loginutils/lib.a  mailutils/lib.a
>>>>>  miscutils/lib.a
>>>>>  modutils/lib.a  networking/lib.a  networking/libiproute/lib.a
>>>>>  networking/udhcp/lib.a  printutils/lib.a  procps/lib.a
>>>>>  runit/lib.a
>>>>>  selinux/lib.a  shell/lib.a  sysklogd/lib.a  util-linux/lib.a
>>>>>  util-linux/volume_id/lib.a  archival/built-in.o
>>>>>  archival/libunarchive/built-in.o  console-tools/built-in.o
>>>>>  coreutils/built-in.o  coreutils/libcoreutils/built-in.o
>>>>>  debianutils/built-in.o  e2fsprogs/built-in.o  editors/built-in.o
>>>>>  findutils/built-in.o  init/built-in.o  libbb/built-in.o
>>>>>  libpwdgrp/built-in.o  loginutils/built-in.o  mailutils/built-in.o
>>>>>  miscutils/built-in.o  modutils/built-in.o  networking/built-in.o
>>>>>  networking/libiproute/built-in.o  networking/udhcp/built-in.o
>>>>>  printutils/built-in.o  procps/built-in.o  runit/built-in.o
>>>>>  selinux/built-in.o  shell/built-in.o  sysklogd/built-in.o
>>>>>  util-linux/built-in.o  util-linux/volume_id/built-in.o" " m
>>>>> crypt"
>>>>>  Trying libraries: crypt m
>>>>>  Failed: -Wl,--start-group -lcrypt -lm -Wl,--end-group
>>>>>  Output of:
>>>>>  gcc -Wall -Wshadow -Wwrite-strings -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes
>>>>> -Wunused
>>>>>  -Wunused-parameter -Wunused-function -Wunused-value
>>>>> -Wmissing-prototypes
>>>>>  -Wmissing-declarations -Wdeclaration-after-statement
>>>>>  -Wold-style-definition -fno-builtin-strlen -finline-limit=0
>>>>>  -fomit-frame-pointer -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
>>>>>  -fno-guess-branch-probability -funsigned-char -static-libgcc
>>>>>  -falign-functions=1 -falign-jumps=1 -falign-labels=1
>>>>> -falign-loops=1 -Os
>>>>>  -static -nostartfiles -LuClibc-0.9.30.1/installed/lib
>>>>>  uClibc-0.9.30.1/installed/lib/crt1.o
>>>>>  uClibc-0.9.30.1/installed/lib/crti.o
>>>>>  uClibc-0.9.30.1/installed/lib/crtn.o -o busybox_unstripped
>>>>>  -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--sort-section,alignment -Wl,--start-group
>>>>>  applets/built-in.o archival/lib.a archival/libunarchive/lib.a
>>>>>  console-tools/lib.a coreutils/lib.a coreutils/libcoreutils/lib.a
>>>>>  debianutils/lib.a e2fsprogs/lib.a editors/lib.a findutils/lib.a
>>>>>  init/lib.a libbb/lib.a libpwdgrp/lib.a loginutils/lib.a
>>>>> mailutils/lib.a
>>>>>  miscutils/lib.a modutils/lib.a networking/lib.a
>>>>>  networking/libiproute/lib.a networking/udhcp/lib.a
>>>>> printutils/lib.a
>>>>>  procps/lib.a runit/lib.a selinux/lib.a shell/lib.a sysklogd/lib.a
>>>>>  util-linux/lib.a util-linux/volume_id/lib.a archival/built-in.o
>>>>>  archival/libunarchive/built-in.o console-tools/built-in.o
>>>>>  coreutils/built-in.o coreutils/libcoreutils/built-in.o
>>>>>  debianutils/built-in.o e2fsprogs/built-in.o editors/built-in.o
>>>>>  findutils/built-in.o init/built-in.o libbb/built-in.o
>>>>>  libpwdgrp/built-in.o loginutils/built-in.o mailutils/built-in.o
>>>>>  miscutils/built-in.o modutils/built-in.o networking/built-in.o
>>>>>  networking/libiproute/built-in.o networking/udhcp/built-in.o
>>>>>  printutils/built-in.o procps/built-in.o runit/built-in.o
>>>>>  selinux/built-in.o shell/built-in.o sysklogd/built-in.o
>>>>>  util-linux/built-in.o util-linux/volume_id/built-in.o
>>>>> -Wl,--end-group
>>>>>  -Wl,--start-group -lcrypt -lm -Wl,--end-group
>>>>>  ==========
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  /usr/lib/gcc/armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi/4.4.5/libgcc_eh.a(unwind-arm.o):
>>>>>  In function `__gnu_Unwind_Backtrace':
>>>>>  (.text+0x8b0): undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  /usr/lib/gcc/armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi/4.4.5/libgcc_eh.a(unwind-arm.o):
>>>>>  In function `__gnu_Unwind_Backtrace':
>>>>>  (.text+0x8b8): undefined reference to `__stack_chk_guard'
>>>>>  collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>>>>>
>>>>>  Poking around with the command that fails, it would appear that
>>>>> it
>>>>> is
>>>>>  -lm that causes the problem, and that appears to be in libgcc.
>>>>>
>>>>>  I tried adding -fno-stack-protector and
>>>>> -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
>>>>>  to this operation, but the problem doesn't go away. I have a
>>>>> sneaky
>>>>>  suspicion that I may (also) need to add this to the uClibc
>>>>> CFLAGS,
>>>>> but
>>>>>  that seems to cause build failures early on.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Any suggestions for a workaround?
>>>>
>>>> Its fixed and works just fine in F-14. Look at the rpms in f-14 and
>>>> use the fixes there, they should be the same.
>>>
>>>  Hmm, interesting. I've been trying 1.15.1-11 from el6, and that
>>> seems
>>>  to bring uClibc with it. The latest from fc14 is 1.15.1-10 and that
>>>  requires uClibc-static instead. I wonder if that is why it works -
>>>  because uClibc was built differently...
>>
>> basically it was split out, but the principal is the same, the build
>> needs changes to build properly on ARM.
>
>  Oh, I see, so the f14 package still needs changes?
>  Where can I find the F14 ARM repository? The one listed in the f14
>  rootfs doesn't seem to contain any packages any more, and wiki doesn't
>  seem to list any links for the F14 repos.

All the changes are upstream in mainline
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux