ttor 2011-10-20 klockan 17:30 +0100 skrev Peter Robinson:
> > How many of these have been submitted upstream?
>
> I suspect very few, there's only about 100 odd there so it shouldn't
> take long to get them upstreamed.
It's not really that many. A very large group of those are the ghc
related ones and is tracked as one and in close relation with mainline
package maintainer.
Not counting the ghc related stuff it's:
anaconda (bug report open)
gcc (mostly merged, except for two patches which is backported from gcc-4.7)
glibc
gypsy
hdf5
hwloc
java-1.5.0-gcj
java-1.6.0-openjdk
js
mpich2 (but maybe not as this.. valgrind supports armv7)
mutter
mysql (partially merged mainline)
netcdf (but maybe not as this.. valgrind supports armv7)
ocaml
pl (but I don't understand why this change is needed)
python-pyblock
pyxf86config
xulrunner, firefox & other Mozilla packages
rpm & yum
> One question I have looking at a number of the spec patches... why is
> in most cases is "armv7hl" uses as the arch instead of %{arm} ?
Those are the ghc related ones. It's because as of yet there is no ghc
on armv5tel. There will be very shortly however. It's not yet decided
if it's worth the effort to update them all in F15 adding the right arch
tag (%{ghc_arches}), or just wait until F16+ where this is already set.
In either case those are not needed for moving to koji. Updating ghc
related packages can be done after koji as well.
The important piece to get merged is the toolchain (ghc + hscolour) and
this is pretty much there already. I have mock built rpms ready for
upload but need to verify that redhat-rpm-config and ghc-rpm-macros is
up to date first and also waiting for the needed changes in ghc to hit
F15 koji (in rawhide now).
Regards
Henrik
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
