Re: Fedora 16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So ive done some thinking, and talked with some of the stakeholders.
> Ive come to the conclusion that we should skip f16 and shoot straight
> for rawhide. two reasons for this. one to become a primary arch at some
> point we need to be caught up and doing releases at the same time. my
> long term goal is for arm to become a primary arch and the second
> reason why i think that we should skip f16 is that its easier to get
> help from maintainers when doing things in rawhide.  I wanted to get a
> quick note out there to get discussion going.

Sounds great to me. OLPC is also looking at skipping F15 for XO
builds; the only reason I'm involved in the ARM F15 work is because it
is a necessary step in the path to getting newer Fedora versions
running. Skipping F16 to get caught up sounds great.

Daniel
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux